A house divided

The tale of a split registry

“Companies and individuals are increasingly considering initial coin offerings (ICOs) as a way to raise capital or participate in investment opportunities. Like any investment, these can carry risk. Get hip to the three “Rs” of ICOs: Risks, Rewards and Responsibilities.”

More importantly, the SEC and other regulators have ruled on the exact use cases of DSV that are being promoted by the ABC and Bitmain team:

DSV sets up and releases a system for gambling, derivatives exchange, and a means to create and trade securities that have not been registered. In allowing “permission-less” trade, it acts outside the law. The unfortunate aspect of ABC removes fungibility.

Coins such as Zcash and now ABC that are seeking to act outside the law can never be fungible. Fungibility is a legal term of art. It means that you exchange for value in good faith and can prove this exchange. By definition, no anonymous coin can be legally fungible. More, to be fungible, the merchant or other party receiving payment cannot know that it is received using an illegal construct. A key aspect of fungibility is that the exchange was completed “without knowledge” of any illegal aspects of the tokens’ history.

With DSV, the chain is constructed with a history. The chain would require a means to have a registration body sign off on the exchange (such as having a PKI-based certificate authority sign all transactions). The merchant would need to validate the entire history of all coins to ensure that all exchanges are legal in the jurisdiction they reside. This is not how Bitcoin works.

Further, with both anonymous coins and tokens and those without legal fungibility, the existing “source-of-wealth” laws mean that you could lose everything, if the chain was later analysed and you were approached to return funds. Merchants have no rights in anonymous and non-fungible systems.

Software in token systems is just a means to more efficiently exchange value in the real world. It covers property that exists in the real world.

When a system splits, only one registry can be valid. This issue of “decentralise everything” misses a critical aspect of reality; you cannot split the rights to many forms of property, and if you are doing this, then none of the systems are valid.

In a fork where a system is used as a registry, the thing that matters is the one registry that is the most true to the original aim and also the one that is completely acting within the law.

As soon as a registry oversteps, or has payments from a source that is not legally fungible, it risks being wound up and all goods being returned to former owners.

Related posts:

Wefood is a supermarket of expired food funded in Denmark. Although it is not a novel idea to sell expired food in order to reduce food waste, I would like to point out one major difference that…

Dear Facebook family and friends, I believe by faith that God The Father, In the name of The Lord Jesus Christ, gave me a Word for you on this Friday, November 23, 2018: “For those of you who drives…

Inbound customer service refers to the process of receiving and handling incoming calls, emails, chats, or other forms of communication from customers. The goal of inbound customer service is to…